SONY

A 2.6-to-4.1GHz Fractional-N Digital PLL Based on a Time-Mode Arithmetic Unit Achieving -249.4dB FoM and -59dBc Fractional Spurs

Date
2022
Academic Conference
International Solid-State Circuits Conference
Authors
Zhong Gao(Delft University of Technology)
Jingchu He(Delft University of Technology)
Martin Fritz(Sony Europe, B.V.)
Jiang Gong(Delft University of Technology)
Yiyu Shen(Delft University of Technology)
Zhirui Zong(Delft University of Technology)
Peng Chen(University College Dublin)
Gerd Spalink(Sony Europe, B.V.)
Ben Eitel(Sony Europe, B.V.)
Ken Yamamoto(Sony Semiconductor Solutions)
Robert Bogdan Staszewski(Delft University of Technology)
Morteza S. Alavi(Delft University of Technology)
Masoud Babaie(Delft University of Technology)
Research Areas
Communication

Abstract

In a fractional-N PLL, it is beneficial to minimize the input range of its phase detector (PD) as it promotes better linearity and higher PD gain for suppressing noise contributions of the following loop components. This can be done by canceling the predicted instantaneous time offset between the frequency reference (FREF) and variable oscillator clock (CKV) edges prior to the PD. There are currently two main cancellation strategies. The first is to align FREF and CKV by inserting a digital-to-time converter (DTC) on either path. However, due to the DTC’s nonlinearity and its susceptibility to PVT variations, the PLL can suffer from large fractional spurs. Although system-level techniques, e.g., background calibration [1], supply ripple reduction [2], and DTC code randomization [3] can partially alleviate these DTC issues, the overall system complexity worsens. The second method is to convert and cancel the predicted time offset in voltage domain [4]. This arrangement is less sensitive to PVT variations. However, the accuracy of the timeto- voltage conversion relies on the strict trade-offs between the power consumption, noise, and linearity of a current source. In this work, we introduce a third solution based on a time-mode arithmetic unit (TAU), which outputs a weighted sum of time delays between the (falling) edges of FREF and CKV, as well as between two consecutive CKV edges. Compared with DTC-based solutions, it is less sensitive to PVT variations, as its output merely varies by the ratio of RC time constants, thus ensuring low fractional spurs with no extra system complexity. Compared to the voltage domain solutions, the absence of a current source is beneficial for phase noise optimization and migration to more advanced technology nodes. Moreover, TAU can implicitly provide a time amplification (TA) gain, thus further suppressing the noise of subsequent blocks.

このページの先頭へ